Quantum Oblivious Transfer: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
==Outline==
==Outline==


The dark count rate is a detector's probability of registering a count during a time slot when no photons are incident on it.
The oblivious transfer protocol occurs in two phases. The preparation phase, followed by the Computation phase.  
The quantum efficiency is the excess probability of registering a count when one photon is incident on the detector.


===Preparation phase===
===Preparation phase===
Line 35: Line 34:
===Computation phase===
===Computation phase===


The sender sends a random sequence of faint pulses of the four canonical polarizations from the standard basis and the hadamard basis.
The sender sends a random sequence of faint pulses of the four canonical polarizations from the standard basis and the Hadamard basis.


The receiver randomly decides for each pulse whether to measure it in the standard or the hadamard basis, and records the basis and measurement result in a table.
The receiver randomly decides for each pulse whether to measure it in the standard or the Hadamard basis, and records the basis and measurement result in a table.
He then reports to the sender the arrival times of all pulses he received, but not the bases or the measurement results.
He then reports to the sender the arrival times of all pulses he received, but not the bases or the measurement results.


Line 47: Line 46:
The sender does not know which word she shares with the receiver.
The sender does not know which word she shares with the receiver.


Using the error-correcting code, sender computes the syndromes of the words corresponding to each set, and she sends them to the receiver over an errorfree channel.
Using the error-correcting code, sender computes the syndromes of the words corresponding to each set, and she sends them to the receiver over an error free channel.
Given this data, the receiver should be able to recover the original word corresponding to his good set but not that corresponding to his bad set.
Given this data, the receiver should be able to recover the original word corresponding to his good set but not that corresponding to his bad set.
Furthermore, the sender computes the parity of a random subset of each set, and tells the receiver the addresses defining these random subsets, but not the resulting parities.
Furthermore, the sender computes the parity of a random subset of each set, and tells the receiver the addresses defining these random subsets, but not the resulting parities.
Line 56: Line 55:
If they are equal, sender gives the xor of same indexed bit and the parity, otherwise she gives him the xor of opposite indexed bit and the parity.
If they are equal, sender gives the xor of same indexed bit and the parity, otherwise she gives him the xor of opposite indexed bit and the parity.
From this, the receiver extracts the desired bit.
From this, the receiver extracts the desired bit.


==Notation==
==Notation==
Write, autoreview, editor, reviewer
3,125

edits

Navigation menu