Verification of Universal Quantum Computation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Properties== | ==Properties== | ||
*[https://complexityzoo.uwaterloo.ca/Complexity_Zoo Complexity Classes] | |||
#'''BQP''' is the class of problems which can be efficiently solved by quantum computers | |||
#'''BPP''' is the class of problems which can be efficiently solved by classical computers. | |||
#'''MA (Merlin-Arthur)''' is the class of problems whose solutions can be verified when given a proof setting called [[witness]]. | |||
#'''IP (interactive-proof system)''' is a generalization of MA, which involves back and forth communication between a verifier (a BPP machine) and prover (has unbounded computational power). | |||
*'''Correctness''' | *'''Correctness''' | ||
*'''Soundness''' | *'''Soundness''' | ||
Revision as of 05:53, 11 June 2019
Functionality
Quantum Computers perform task which are intractable for classical computers. The basic question here would be, "How should one verify the result of a quantum computer? This task is known as quantum verification or verification of quantum computation. Tags: Quantum Functionality, Universal Task
Use Case
- Quantum task
- Classical analogue: Classical Verification of Quantum Computation
- Best Implementation specifications
Protocols
Properties
- BQP is the class of problems which can be efficiently solved by quantum computers
- BPP is the class of problems which can be efficiently solved by classical computers.
- MA (Merlin-Arthur) is the class of problems whose solutions can be verified when given a proof setting called witness.
- IP (interactive-proof system) is a generalization of MA, which involves back and forth communication between a verifier (a BPP machine) and prover (has unbounded computational power).
- Correctness
- Soundness
Further Information
- Review Papers
References
contributed by Shraddha Singh