Write, autoreview, editor, reviewer
3,129
edits
m (→Discussion) |
m (→Discussion) |
||
Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
# [https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0105032 GC-QDS (2001)] uses [[quantum one way function]] f(); Private keys: classical input x, Public keys: quantum output f(x). '''Requires''' quantum memory, quantum one way function, authenticated quantum channels, [[SWAP Test]] (universal quantum computer). [[Unconditionally Secure]], [[Third Network Stage: Quantum Memory|Third Network Stage (Quantum Memory)]] | # [https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0105032 GC-QDS (2001)] uses [[quantum one way function]] f(); Private keys: classical input x, Public keys: quantum output f(x). '''Requires''' quantum memory, quantum one way function, authenticated quantum channels, [[SWAP Test]] (universal quantum computer). [[Unconditionally Secure]], [[Third Network Stage: Quantum Memory|Third Network Stage (Quantum Memory)]] | ||
#[https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0601130 ACJ (2006)] discusses coherent states comparison with a QDS scheme outlined in the last section. Protocol uses the same protocol as (2) but replaces qubits with [[coherent states]], thus replacing SWAP-Test with [[Coherent State Comparison]]. [[Unconditionally Secure]], [[Third Network Stage: Quantum Memory|Third Network Stage (Quantum Memory)]] | #[https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0601130 ACJ (2006)] discusses coherent states comparison with a QDS scheme outlined in the last section. Protocol uses the same protocol as (2) but replaces qubits with [[coherent states]], thus replacing SWAP-Test with [[Coherent State Comparison]]. [[Unconditionally Secure]], [[Third Network Stage: Quantum Memory|Third Network Stage (Quantum Memory)]] | ||
#[https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.07509 | #[https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.07509 AWA (2015)] security proof for generalisation of [1][https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.5551 WDKA (2015)] extension to more than two recipients case. | ||
#[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280034032_Secure_Quantum_Signatures_Using_Insecure_Quantum_Channels AWKA (2015)] | |||
#[http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/766/1/012021 MH (2016)] security proof for generalisation of [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280034032_Secure_Quantum_Signatures_Using_Insecure_Quantum_Channels AWKA (2015)] extension to more than two recipients case. | |||
#[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030402617308069 SWZY (2017)] Discusses an attack on existing QDS scheme and suggests corrections. Protocol uses rotation, qubits, [[one-way hash function]]; Private keys: angle of rotation, Public keys: string of rotated quantum states. '''Requires''' [[random number generator]], [[one-way hash function]], quantum memory, key distribution. [[Computationally Secure]], [[Third Network Stage: Quantum Memory|Third Network Stage (Quantum Memory)]] | #[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030402617308069 SWZY (2017)] Discusses an attack on existing QDS scheme and suggests corrections. Protocol uses rotation, qubits, [[one-way hash function]]; Private keys: angle of rotation, Public keys: string of rotated quantum states. '''Requires''' [[random number generator]], [[one-way hash function]], quantum memory, key distribution. [[Computationally Secure]], [[Third Network Stage: Quantum Memory|Third Network Stage (Quantum Memory)]] | ||
*Experimental Papers | *Experimental Papers |