Quantum Digital Signature: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Functionality==
==Functionality==
Digital Signatures (QDS) allow the exchange of classical messages from sender to multiple recipients, with a guarantee that the signature has come from a genuine sender. Additionally, it comes with the properties of [[Quantum Digital Signature#Properties|transferability]], [[Quantum Digital Signature#Properties|non-repudiation]] and [[Quantum Digital Signature#Properties|unforgeability]]. In contrast, classical digital signatures rely on authentication (taken as an assumption for some QDS protocols) i.e. the message has come from the claimed party; integrity i.e. the message has not been altered (if authentication is confirmed, this property is unforgeability) and non-repudiation (same as QDS). A digital signature not just authenticates an electronic document but also ensures that it has not been tampered with and prevents anyone denying a true signature.<br/>
Digital Signatures (QDS) allow the exchange of classical messages from sender to multiple recipients, with a guarantee that the signature has come from a genuine sender. Additionally, it comes with the properties of [[Quantum Digital Signature#Properties|transferability]], [[Quantum Digital Signature#Properties|non-repudiation]] and [[Quantum Digital Signature#Properties|unforgeability]]. In contrast, classical digital signatures rely on authentication (taken as an assumption for some QDS protocols) i.e. the message has come from the claimed party; integrity i.e. the message has not been altered (if authentication is confirmed, this property is unforgeability) and non-repudiation (same as QDS). A digital signature not just authenticates an electronic document but also ensures that it has not been tampered with and prevents anyone denying a true signature. Note that QDS schemes sign classical messages and not quantum messages. Signing quantum messages is not possible [[Quantum Digital Signature#References|(1), (2)]]. <br/>


'''Tags:'''  [[:Category: Multi Party Protocols|Multi Party (three)]],  [[:Category: Quantum Enhanced Classical Functionality|Quantum Enhanced Classical Functionality]],  [[:Category: Specific Task|Specific Task]]
'''Tags:'''  [[:Category: Multi Party Protocols|Multi Party (three)]],  [[:Category: Quantum Enhanced Classical Functionality|Quantum Enhanced Classical Functionality]],  [[:Category: Specific Task|Specific Task]]
Line 36: Line 36:


==Further Information==
==Further Information==
Unlike classical digital signature schemes which generalize a two party model, QDS protocols always study a three party model as transferability is not inherent and has to be proved in the quantum case. Given this situation, usually, the third party acts as the judge (a verififer) who would gain nothing out of cheating, and hence, cheating strategy is only studied for seller (repudiation) and buyer (forgery). Quantum digital signatures provide unconditional security, not relying on any computational assumption which is its basic advantage over the classical schemes. However, over time classical unconditionally secure digital signature schemes have been realized. These classical protocols take extra some assumptions like trusted omnipotent (one who distributes everyone signatures) or authenticated message broadcast. QDS does not require any such assumption. Yet, the low key rate could render QDS impractical over classical digital signature schemes. At the same time, there exist post quantum secure Digital signature schemes based on hash-key cryptography which cannot be broken by quantum computers.  Still, if someone requires a lifetime security without the above mentioned assumptions, QDS is the answer. Areas to improve QDS could be addressing the key rate and scalability of key length with length of message.  
Unlike classical digital signature schemes which generalize a two party model, QDS protocols always study a three party model as transferability is not inherent and has to be proved in the quantum case. Given this situation, usually, the third party acts as the judge (a verififer) who would gain nothing out of cheating, and hence, cheating strategy is only studied for seller (repudiation) and buyer (forgery). Quantum digital signatures provide unconditional security, not relying on any computational assumption which is its basic advantage over the classical schemes. However, over time classical unconditionally secure digital signature schemes have been realized. These classical protocols take extra some assumptions like trusted omnipotent (one who distributes everyone signatures) or authenticated message broadcast. QDS does not require any such assumption. Yet, the low key rate could render QDS impractical over classical digital signature schemes. At the same time, there exist post quantum secure Digital signature schemes based on hash-key cryptography which cannot be broken by quantum computers.  Still, if someone requires a lifetime security without the above mentioned assumptions, QDS is the answer. Areas to improve QDS could be addressing the key rate and scalability of key length with length of message. Following are a few articles useful for those interested in a more detailed overview of QDS. 


===Review Papers===
*Review Papers
#[https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Unconditionally-Secure-Quantum-Signatures-Amiri-Andersson/2c9a298c9e902c5162496cc13f5d560427873412 AA (2015)] Discusses various classical and quantum digital signature schemes
#[https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Unconditionally-Secure-Quantum-Signatures-Amiri-Andersson/2c9a298c9e902c5162496cc13f5d560427873412 AA (2015)] Discusses various classical and quantum digital signature schemes
#Wallden P. (2018) (In preparation): Discusses the development of Quantum Digital Signatures from the first protocol by Gottesman and Chuang, elaborating advancements in further protocols to turn it into a practical QDS scheme.
#Wallden P. (2018) (In preparation): Discusses the development of Quantum Digital Signatures from the first protocol by Gottesman and Chuang, elaborating advancements in further protocols to turn it into a practical QDS scheme.
==References==
[https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0205128 Barum et al (2002)] First intuition towards impossibility of signing quantum states
[https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/1164 Alagic et al (2018)] Impossibility result of signing quantum states




<div style='text-align: right;'>''contributed by Shraddha Singh''</div>
<div style='text-align: right;'>''contributed by Shraddha Singh''</div>
Write, autoreview, editor, reviewer
3,129

edits

Navigation menu