Anonymous Transmission: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
  [[Category: Quantum Memory Network Stage]]
  [[Category: Quantum Memory Network Stage]]
* GHZ-based protocol is deterministic, whereas W-based protocol is probabilistic, but the W-based protocol tolerates more noise.
* GHZ-based protocol is deterministic, whereas W-based protocol is probabilistic, but the W-based protocol tolerates more noise.
* Entanglement relay protocol does not require a preshared multipartite state, but it creates a 4-partite GHZ state during the protocol.
* Entanglement relay protocol does not require a pre-shared multipartite state, but it creates a 4-partite GHZ state during the protocol.


==Properties==
==Properties==
Line 18: Line 18:
*'''Guessing probability''' Let <math>\mathcal{A}</math> be a subset of adversaries among <math>n</math> nodes. Let <math>C</math> be the register that contains all classical and quantum side information accessible to the adversaries. Then, the probability of adversaries guessing the sender is given by
*'''Guessing probability''' Let <math>\mathcal{A}</math> be a subset of adversaries among <math>n</math> nodes. Let <math>C</math> be the register that contains all classical and quantum side information accessible to the adversaries. Then, the probability of adversaries guessing the sender is given by
<math> P_{\text{guess}}[S|C, S\notin \mathcal{A}] = \max_{\{M^i\}} \sum_{i \in [n]} P[S=i|S\notin \mathcal{A}] \text{Tr}[M^i \cdot \rho_{C|S=i} ],</math></br>
<math> P_{\text{guess}}[S|C, S\notin \mathcal{A}] = \max_{\{M^i\}} \sum_{i \in [n]} P[S=i|S\notin \mathcal{A}] \text{Tr}[M^i \cdot \rho_{C|S=i} ],</math></br>
where the maximization is taken over the set of POVMs <math>{\{M^i\}}</math> for the adversaries and <math>\rho_{C|S=i}</math> is the state of the adversaries at the end of the protocol, given that node <math>i</math> is the sender  
where the maximisation is taken over the set of POVMs <math>{\{M^i\}}</math> for the adversaries and <math>\rho_{C|S=i}</math> is the state of the adversaries at the end of the protocol, given that node <math>i</math> is the sender  
*'''Sender-security''' We say that an anonymous transmission protocol is ''sender-secure'' if, given that the sender is honest, the probability of the adversary guessing the sender is </br>
*'''Sender-security''' We say that an anonymous transmission protocol is ''sender-secure'' if, given that the sender is honest, the probability of the adversary guessing the sender is </br>
<math>P_{\text{guess}}[S|C,S\notin \mathcal{A}] \leq \max_{i\in[n]} P[S=i|S\notin \mathcal{A}].</math></br>
<math>P_{\text{guess}}[S|C,S\notin \mathcal{A}] \leq \max_{i\in[n]} P[S=i|S\notin \mathcal{A}].</math></br>
Line 27: Line 27:


==Further Information==
==Further Information==
* The definitions above guarantee information-theoretic security of the protocol when the resource states are both trusted [[Quantum Anonymous Transmission#References|[4], [1], [2] ]] and untrusted [[Quantum Anonymous Transmission#References|[3] ]].
* The definitions above guarantee information-theoretic security of the protocol when the resource states are both trusted [[Quantum Anonymous Transmission#References|[4], [1], [2] ]] and not trusted [[Quantum Anonymous Transmission#References|[3] ]].
==References==
==References==
#[https://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.052320 Lipinska et al (2018)]
#[https://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.052320 Lipinska et al (2018)]
Write, autoreview, editor, reviewer
3,129

edits

Navigation menu