Editing Randomness amplification (8 devices)

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 114: Line 114:


[https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms11345 Brandão et. al.] also provide a protocol that achieves randomness amplification using only four devices, however, the randomness extractor required to produce multiple bits is only defined implicitly (i.e. we can prove that it exists but have not yet been able to construct it). A randomness extractor does exist that is able to produce a single private bit.
[https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms11345 Brandão et. al.] also provide a protocol that achieves randomness amplification using only four devices, however, the randomness extractor required to produce multiple bits is only defined implicitly (i.e. we can prove that it exists but have not yet been able to construct it). A randomness extractor does exist that is able to produce a single private bit.
==Further Information==
==References==
<div style='text-align: right;'>''contributed by Neil Mcblane''</div>
Please note that all contributions to Quantum Protocol Zoo may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Quantum Protocol Zoo:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)