Quantum Protocol Zoo:General disclaimer: Difference between revisions

From Quantum Protocol Zoo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "We are not judging the correctness or importance of the functionalities or protocols presented in the zoo. We aim only to provide a unified presentation of protocols already...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
We are not judging the correctness or importance of the functionalities or protocols presented in the zoo. We aim only to  provide a unified presentation of protocols already published elsewhere. To ensure quality we choose to present only papers already reviewed. The current collections of protocol does not present any concrete decision making procedures apart from familiarities of the founders and contributors to the content. The reviewer acts as our steering committee to ensure the proper development of the Zoo as it expands and are acting on yearly rotation. The Zoo is not aiming to replace other existing and we intend to integrate all such works eventually into our system as well as giving the reference at appropriate places, within the description of protocols or at the relevant links section (we should use the tile of relevant link instead of review papers to cite all that matters there). We strongly invite the whole community to contribute to extend and improve the Zoo (see the invitation paper, we add the link to arrive paper once uploaded here). Any contributors will be properly cited and the contributor name will app read at the corresponding pages (we should already do that for current pages). Finally the format and structure of the zoo is defined by the founders and our sponsored or contributors or reviewers do not bare any responsibility while providing us fruitful insight and comments from the early stage of the development.
We are not judging the correctness or importance of the functionalities or protocols presented in the zoo. We aim only to  provide a unified presentation of protocols already published elsewhere. To ensure quality we choose to present only papers already reviewed. The current collections of protocol does not present any concrete decision making procedures apart from familiarities of the founders and contributors to the content. The reviewer acts as our steering committee to ensure the proper development of the Zoo as it expands and are acting on yearly rotation. The Zoo is not aiming to replace other existing review papers or similar attempts and we intend to integrate all such works eventually into our system as well as giving the reference at appropriate places, within the description of protocols or at the relevant links section (we should use the tile of relevant link instead of review papers to cite all that matters there). We strongly invite the whole community to contribute to extend and improve the Zoo (see the invitation paper, we add the link to arrive paper once uploaded here). Any contributors will be properly cited and the contributor name will app read at the corresponding pages (we should already do that for current pages). Finally the format and structure of the zoo is defined by the founders and our sponsored or contributors or reviewers do not bare any responsibility while providing us fruitful insight and comments from the early stage of the development.

Revision as of 21:30, 17 April 2019

We are not judging the correctness or importance of the functionalities or protocols presented in the zoo. We aim only to provide a unified presentation of protocols already published elsewhere. To ensure quality we choose to present only papers already reviewed. The current collections of protocol does not present any concrete decision making procedures apart from familiarities of the founders and contributors to the content. The reviewer acts as our steering committee to ensure the proper development of the Zoo as it expands and are acting on yearly rotation. The Zoo is not aiming to replace other existing review papers or similar attempts and we intend to integrate all such works eventually into our system as well as giving the reference at appropriate places, within the description of protocols or at the relevant links section (we should use the tile of relevant link instead of review papers to cite all that matters there). We strongly invite the whole community to contribute to extend and improve the Zoo (see the invitation paper, we add the link to arrive paper once uploaded here). Any contributors will be properly cited and the contributor name will app read at the corresponding pages (we should already do that for current pages). Finally the format and structure of the zoo is defined by the founders and our sponsored or contributors or reviewers do not bare any responsibility while providing us fruitful insight and comments from the early stage of the development.