Prepare and Measure Quantum Digital Signature: Difference between revisions

Prepare and Measure Quantum Digital Signature (edit)

Revision as of 12:12, 7 November 2018

1,357 bytes removed , 7 November 2018

m

→‎Discussion

Shraddha

Write, autoreview, editor, reviewer

3,129

edits

@@ Line 99: / Line 99: @@
 *Theoretical Papers
 #[https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.5551  WDKA (2015)] above example
-# [https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0105032 GC-QDS (2001)] uses [[quantum one way function]] f(); Private keys: classical input x, Public keys: quantum output f(x). '''Requires''' quantum memory, quantum one way function, authenticated quantum and classical channels, [[SWAP Test]] (universal quantum computer). [[Unconditionally Secure]]. [[Network Stage: Quantum Memory]]
-#[https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0601130 ACJ (2006)] discusses coherent states comparison with a QDS scheme outlined in the last section. Protocol uses the same protocol as (2) but replaces qubits with [[coherent states]], thus replacing SWAP-Test with [[Coherent State Comparison]]. Additionally, it also requires quantum memory, authenticated quantum and classical channels, [[multiports]]. [[Unconditionally Secure]], [[Network Stage: Quantum Memory]]
 #[https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.1375 DWA (2013)] first QDS scheme without quantum memory based on [https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0601130 (3)]. '''Requires''' [[Coherent States]], authenticated quantum and classical channels, [[multiports]], [[Unambiguous State Discrimination (USD)]] (State Elimination), no symmetrisation required. [[Unconditionally Secure]]. [[Network Stage: Prepare and Measure]]
 #[https://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.042335 AL (2014)] Establishes coherent state mapping of (2). Replaces SWAP Test with beam splitters. Uses [[Unambiguous State Discrimination (USD)]] (State Elimination). '''Requires''' [[Phase encoded Coherent states]], [[Balanced Beam Splitters]]. No explicit security proof provided. [[Network Stage: Prepare and Measure]]
@@ Line 108: / Line 106: @@
 #[http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/766/1/012021 MH (2016)] security proof for generalisation of [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280034032_Secure_Quantum_Signatures_Using_Insecure_Quantum_Channels  AWKA (2015)] to more than two recipients case.
 #[https://www.nature.com/articles/srep09231 WCRZ (2015)] demonstrates sending multi-bit classical messages using [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280034032_Secure_Quantum_Signatures_Using_Insecure_Quantum_Channels  AWKA (2015)] or other similar protocols.
-#[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030402617308069 SWZY (2017)] Discusses an attack and suggests corrections on existing QDS scheme using single qubit rotations. Protocol uses rotation, qubits, [[one-way hash function]]; Private keys: angle of rotation, Public keys: string of rotated quantum states. '''Requires''' [[random number generator]], [[one-way hash function]], quantum memory, key distribution. [[Computationally Secure]], [[Third Network Stage: Quantum Memory|Third Network Stage (Quantum Memory)]]
 *Experimental Papers