Write, autoreview, editor, reviewer
3,129
edits
Prepare and Measure Quantum Digital Signature: Difference between revisions
Prepare and Measure Quantum Digital Signature (edit)
Revision as of 15:22, 11 November 2018
, 11 November 2018→Relevant Papers
| Line 108: | Line 108: | ||
##'''Requires''' authenticated classical channels, [[polarisation measurement]] in three bases, [[Unambiguous State Discrimination (USD)]] (State Elimination), uses quantum correlations to check authentication. Decoy State method uses [[Coherent States|phase-randomised weak coherent states]], [[50:50 Beam Splitter (BS)]]. | ##'''Requires''' authenticated classical channels, [[polarisation measurement]] in three bases, [[Unambiguous State Discrimination (USD)]] (State Elimination), uses quantum correlations to check authentication. Decoy State method uses [[Coherent States|phase-randomised weak coherent states]], [[50:50 Beam Splitter (BS)]]. | ||
##Security: [[Information-theoretic]]. | ##Security: [[Information-theoretic]]. | ||
#[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280034032_Secure_Quantum_Signatures_Using_Insecure_Quantum_Channels AWKA (2015)] QDS scheme without authenticated quantum channels using parameter estimation phase. Uses a Key | #[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280034032_Secure_Quantum_Signatures_Using_Insecure_Quantum_Channels AWKA (2015)] QDS scheme without authenticated quantum channels using parameter estimation phase. Uses a Key Generation Protocol (KGP) where noise threshold for Seller-Buyer and Seller-Verifier is better than when distilling secret key from QKD. Seller sends different key to Buyer and Verifier using KGP. This anamoly is justifiable due to symmetrisation. | ||
##'''Requires''' authenticated classical channels, [[Decoy State QKD]] setup. | ##'''Requires''' authenticated classical channels, [[Decoy State QKD]] setup. | ||
##Security: [[Information-theoretic]]. | ##Security: [[Information-theoretic]]. | ||
| Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
#[http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/766/1/012021 MH (2016)] security proof for generalisation of [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280034032_Secure_Quantum_Signatures_Using_Insecure_Quantum_Channels AWKA (2015)] to more than two recipients case. | #[http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/766/1/012021 MH (2016)] security proof for generalisation of [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280034032_Secure_Quantum_Signatures_Using_Insecure_Quantum_Channels AWKA (2015)] to more than two recipients case. | ||
'''Experimental Papers''' | '''Experimental Papers''' | ||
#[https://physics.aps.org/featured-article-pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.040502 CDDWCEJB (2014)] first experimental demostartion of a QDS scheme without quantum memory, implements a variant of [https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.1375 DWA (2013)]. Uses unambiguous state elimination (USE) instead of unambiguous state determination (USD) | |||
##Per half-bit message: rate=1.4 bits per second, security bound=0.01%, Length of the key (L)= <math>10^13</math> | |||
#[https://researchportal.hw.ac.uk/en/publications/experimental-demonstration-of-kilometer-range-quantum-digital-sig DCKAWDJAB(2015)] Implements [https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.5551 WDKA (2015)]. | #[https://researchportal.hw.ac.uk/en/publications/experimental-demonstration-of-kilometer-range-quantum-digital-sig DCKAWDJAB(2015)] Implements [https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.5551 WDKA (2015)]. | ||
##Uses [[Coherent States|phase encoded coherent states]] | ##Uses [[Coherent States|phase encoded coherent states]] | ||