Quantum Key Distribution: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[Category: Two Party Protocols]] [[Category: Quantum Enhanced Classical Functionality]] [[Category:Specific Task]] | [[Category: Two Party Protocols]] [[Category: Quantum Enhanced Classical Functionality]] [[Category:Specific Task]] | ||
== Use Cases == | |||
* Can replace Diffie-Hellman key agreement protocols. For example in TLS, SSL, IPsec, etc. | |||
* If secure key rate are sufficiently high, one can use QKD for information theoretically secure authenticated encryption scheme, e.g. One-time pad together with the authentication scheme presented in [[Quantum Key Distribution #References|[1] ]]. | |||
==Protocols== | ==Protocols== | ||
Line 25: | Line 29: | ||
==Further Information== | ==Further Information== | ||
The security definition presented here, are proven to be sufficient to guarantee universal composability for standard QKD in [[Quantum Key Distribution #References|[ | The security definition presented here, are proven to be sufficient to guarantee universal composability for standard QKD in [[Quantum Key Distribution #References|[2] ]]. For device-independent quantum key distribution, attacks presented in [[Quantum Key Distribution #References|[3] ]] show that security can be compromised if the same devices are used to implement another instance of the protocol. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
#[https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48329-2_30 Codes for Interactive Authentication] | |||
#[https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3525 PR (2014)] discusses security of various QKD schemes composed in other cryptographic protocols. | #[https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3525 PR (2014)] discusses security of various QKD schemes composed in other cryptographic protocols. | ||
#[https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.010503 BCK (2013)] Analyses device independent QKD | #[https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.010503 BCK (2013)] Analyses device independent QKD |
Revision as of 10:19, 2 May 2019
Functionality Description
Quantum key distribution is a task that enables two parties, Alice and Bob, to establish a classical secret key by using quantum systems. A classical secret key is a random string of bits known to only Alice and Bob, and completely unknown to any third party, namely an eavesdropper. Such a secret key can for example be used to encrypt a classical message sent over a public channel.
Tags: Two Party, Quantum Enhanced Classical Functionality, Specific Task, unconditional security (information theoretical security), random number generator, key generation, secret key
Use Cases
- Can replace Diffie-Hellman key agreement protocols. For example in TLS, SSL, IPsec, etc.
- If secure key rate are sufficiently high, one can use QKD for information theoretically secure authenticated encryption scheme, e.g. One-time pad together with the authentication scheme presented in [1] .
Protocols
- BB84 Quantum Key Distribution: Prepare and Measure Network Stage
- Device Independent Quantum Key Distribution:Entanglement Distribution Network Stage
Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution (DI-QKD) has better security guarantees than BB84 QKD.
Properties
A quantum key distribution protocol is secure if it is correct and secret. Correctness is the statement that Alice and Bob share the same string of bits, namely the secret key, at the end of the protocol. Secrecy is the statement that the eavesdropper is totally ignorant about the final key.
- Correctness A QKD protocol is -correct if the probability that the final key of Alice differs from the final key of Bob, is smaller than
- Secrecy A QKD protocol is -secret if for every input state it holds that
Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{\|{\rho_{K_AE}}-{\tau_{K_A}\otimes \rho_E}\|}_1\leq \epsilon_{\rm sec},} where is the maximally mixed state in the space of strings , and is the trace norm.
- A protocol implements a -QKD if with rounds it generates an -correct and -secret key of size bits.
Further Information
The security definition presented here, are proven to be sufficient to guarantee universal composability for standard QKD in [2] . For device-independent quantum key distribution, attacks presented in [3] show that security can be compromised if the same devices are used to implement another instance of the protocol.
References
- Codes for Interactive Authentication
- PR (2014) discusses security of various QKD schemes composed in other cryptographic protocols.
- BCK (2013) Analyses device independent QKD