Interactive Proofs for Quantum Computation: Difference between revisions
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*<math>Dec_k (\rho')</math>: Decoded state obtained by the receiver | *<math>Dec_k (\rho')</math>: Decoded state obtained by the receiver | ||
==Requirements== | ==Requirements== | ||
== | ==Protocol Description== | ||
==Further Information== | ==Further Information== | ||
Latest revision as of 11:50, 12 July 2019
Providing solution to the functionality Verification of Quantum Computation, is a class MA (Merlin-Arthur) that consists of all the problems whose solution can be verified by a BPP machine (verifier that has a classical computer) when given a proof by a 'witness' (prover). As believed, MA is not entirely contained in BQP (problems that can be solved by a quantum computer) (1)(2), the functionality of verification asks 'Does every problem in BQP admit an interactive-proof system in which the prover is restricted to BQP computations?' The example protocol answers this question by defining quantum prover interactive proofs and state 'Any language in BQP has a QPIP (quantum prover interactive proofs) which hides the computation from the prover'. IP (interactive proof systems) is a generalisation of class MA, which involves multiple interaction between the prover (untrusted company) and the verifier (consumer).
Assumptions[edit]
- It is assumed that the company and consumer share a classical key drawn from a probability distribution.
Outline[edit]
Notations[edit]
- :classical key
- :Probability distribution from which the classical key has been drawn
- : State to be authenticated
- : Test state for successful authentication
- : Encoding procedure
- : Encoded state sent over insecure channel by the sender
- : Encoded state tampered by eavesdropper through insecure channel, received by the receiver
- : Decoding procedure
- : Decoded state obtained by the receiver