Editing Quantum Key Distribution
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Functionality | ==Functionality== | ||
Quantum key distribution | Quantum key distribution is a task that enables two parties, Alice and Bob, to establish a classical secret key by using quantum systems. A classical secret key is a random string of bits known to only Alice and Bob, and completely unknown to any third party, namely an eavesdropper. Such a secret key can for example be used to encrypt a classical message sent over a public channel. | ||
'''Tags:''' [[:Category: Two Party Protocols|Two Party]], [[:Category: Quantum Enhanced Classical Functionality|Quantum Enhanced Classical Functionality]], [[:Category: Specific Task|Specific Task]], unconditional security (information theoretical security), random number generator, key generation, secret key | '''Tags:''' [[:Category: Two Party Protocols|Two Party]], [[:Category: Quantum Enhanced Classical Functionality|Quantum Enhanced Classical Functionality]], [[:Category: Specific Task|Specific Task]], unconditional security (information theoretical security), random number generator, key generation, secret key | ||
[[Category: Two Party Protocols]] [[Category: Quantum Enhanced Classical Functionality]] [[Category:Specific Task]] | [[Category: Two Party Protocols]] [[Category: Quantum Enhanced Classical Functionality]] [[Category:Specific Task]] | ||
==Protocols== | ==Protocols== | ||
*[[BB84 Quantum Key Distribution]]: [[:Category: | *[[BB84 Quantum Key Distribution]]: [[:Category: Prepare and Measure Network Stage]] | ||
*[[Device Independent Quantum Key Distribution]]:[[:Category: | *[[Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution]]:[[:Category: Entanglement Distribution Network Stage]] | ||
Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution (DI-QKD) | Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution (DI-QKD) has better security guarantees than BB84 QKD. | ||
==Properties== | ==Properties== | ||
A quantum key distribution protocol is secure if it is ''correct'' and ''secret''. Correctness is the statement that Alice and Bob share the same string of bits, namely the secret key, at the end of the protocol. Secrecy is the statement that the eavesdropper is | A quantum key distribution protocol is secure if it is ''correct'' and ''secret''. Correctness is the statement that Alice and Bob share the same string of bits, namely the secret key, at the end of the protocol. Secrecy is the statement that the eavesdropper is totally ignorant about the final key. | ||
*'''Correctness''' A QKD protocol is <math>\epsilon_{\rm corr}</math>-correct if the probability that the final key of Alice differs from the final key of Bob, is smaller than <math>\epsilon_{\rm corr}</math> | *'''Correctness''' A QKD protocol is <math>\epsilon_{\rm corr}</math>-correct if the probability that the final key of Alice differs from the final key of Bob, is smaller than <math>\epsilon_{\rm corr}</math> | ||
Line 31: | Line 23: | ||
*A protocol implements a <math>(n,\epsilon_{\rm corr},\epsilon_{\rm sec},\ell)</math>-QKD if with <math>n</math> rounds it generates an <math>\epsilon_{\rm corr}</math>-correct and <math>\epsilon_{\rm sec}</math>-secret key of size <math>\ell</math> bits. | *A protocol implements a <math>(n,\epsilon_{\rm corr},\epsilon_{\rm sec},\ell)</math>-QKD if with <math>n</math> rounds it generates an <math>\epsilon_{\rm corr}</math>-correct and <math>\epsilon_{\rm sec}</math>-secret key of size <math>\ell</math> bits. | ||
== | ==Discussion== | ||
The security definition presented here, are proven to be sufficient to guarantee universal composability for standard QKD in | The security definition presented here, Definition \ref{def:correct} and \ref{def:secret}, are proven to be sufficient to guarantee universal composability for standard QKD in (2). For device-independent quantum key distribution, attacks presented in (1) show that security can be compromised if the same devices are used to implement another instance of the protocol. | ||
#[https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.010503 BCK (2013)] Analyses device independent QKD | |||
#[https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3525 PR (2014)] discusses security of various QKD schemes composed in other cryptographic protocols. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
# | #C. Portmann and R. Renner, [https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3525 Cryptographic security of quantum key distribution] | ||
#J. Barrett, R. Colbeck, and A. Kent, [https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.010503 Memory attacks on device-independent quantum cryptography] | |||
#[https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.010503 | |||