Editing Measurement Device Independent Quantum Digital Signature (MDI-QDS)

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 99: Line 99:
==Further Information==
==Further Information==
MDI-QDS is so far the best [[:Category:Prepare and Measure Network Stage|Prepare and Measure Network Stage]] QDS protocol. It does not rely on the measurement devices and is easy from implementation point of view.  Unlike classical schemes, this protocol does not assume a ''trusted'' arbitrator. As the platform of widely implemented MDI-QKD is available, MDI-QDS can be implemented most efficiently and provides the best security in the QDS protocols discovered so far. Another approach would be to adapt DI-QKD for key generation. Here one would neither trust the measurement devices nor the source. As seller and buyer both act as an adversary in QDS protocols, we do not want depend on our state preparation devices either. This has not been studied yet due to as QDS protocols discovered so far yet do not match up to the efficiency of classical and post-quantum digital signature schemes in terms of signing time, key length, etc.  
MDI-QDS is so far the best [[:Category:Prepare and Measure Network Stage|Prepare and Measure Network Stage]] QDS protocol. It does not rely on the measurement devices and is easy from implementation point of view.  Unlike classical schemes, this protocol does not assume a ''trusted'' arbitrator. As the platform of widely implemented MDI-QKD is available, MDI-QDS can be implemented most efficiently and provides the best security in the QDS protocols discovered so far. Another approach would be to adapt DI-QKD for key generation. Here one would neither trust the measurement devices nor the source. As seller and buyer both act as an adversary in QDS protocols, we do not want depend on our state preparation devices either. This has not been studied yet due to as QDS protocols discovered so far yet do not match up to the efficiency of classical and post-quantum digital signature schemes in terms of signing time, key length, etc.  
*'''Theoretical Papers'''
#[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011EPJD...61..773Y Guang et al (2011)] A scheme for untrusted arbitartor like MDI-QDS, but trusts its measurement devices
*'''Experimental Papers'''
*'''Experimental Papers'''
#[https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.00493 Roberts et al (2017)] Implementation of the example protocol
#[https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.00493 Roberts et al (2017)] Implementation of the above protocol


==References==
==References==
Please note that all contributions to Quantum Protocol Zoo may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Quantum Protocol Zoo:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Template used on this page: