Open main menu
Home
Random
Log in
Settings
About Quantum Protocol Zoo
Disclaimers
Quantum Protocol Zoo
Search
Editing
Coin Flipping
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Functionality description== Coin flipping is a cryptographic primitive which allows two mistrustful parties, Alice and Bob, to remotely generate a random bit, such that none of the two parties can bias the outcome beyond a specified probability. In order to explicit the protocol properties, let us first define and upper-bound Alice and Bob's probabilities of forcing their opponent to declare outcome <math>i</math> as: <math> P_{A}^{(i)} \leq 1/2 + \epsilon_A^{(i)} </math> Alice forces Bob to declare <math>i</math> <math> P_{B}^{(i)} \leq 1/2 + \epsilon_B^{(i)} </math> Bob forces Alice to declare <math>i</math> ==Properties== * A coin flipping scheme is '''fair''' when it outputs bit <math>0</math> with probability <math>\frac{1-\Delta}{2}</math> and bit <math>1</math> with probability <math>\frac{1-\Delta}{2}</math>, where <math>\Delta</math> is the honest probability that the protocol aborts. * A coin flipping scheme is '''secure''' with bias <math>\epsilon</math> when none of the parties can force any outcome with probability higher than <math>\frac{1}{2}+\epsilon</math>, where <math>\epsilon= \max\Bigg\{\epsilon_A^{(0)},\epsilon_A^{(1)},\epsilon_B^{(0)},\epsilon_B^{(1)}\Bigg\}</math> . * A coin flipping scheme is '''balanced''' when <math>\epsilon_A^{(0)}=\epsilon_A^{(1)}=\epsilon_B^{(0)}=\epsilon_B^{(1)}</math>. ==Protocols== ''Strong coin flipping (SCF)'' In SCF, two parties remotely wish to agree on a random bit such that none of the parties can bias any outcome with a probability higher than <math>1/2+\epsilon</math>, where <math>\epsilon</math> is the protocol bias. SCF is fundamental in multiparty computation, online gaming and more general randomized consensus protocols involving leader election. Using quantum mechanics, information-theoretically secure SCF is possible, but with a fundamental lower bound on the achievable bias: <math> \epsilon \geqslant \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}-\frac{1}{2} \approx 0.207. </math> ''Weak coin flipping (WCF)'' In WCF, two parties wish to agree on a random bit in the same manner as SCF, but given that they both have known, preferred, opposite outcomes. In other words, the outcome of the flip will designate a winner and a loser. In the classical world, WCF arises from SCF with two unconstrained biases (Alice and Bob can always choose to lose with probability <math>P_{A}^{(1)}=P_{B}^{(0)}=1</math>): <math> P_{A}^{(0)} \leqslant\frac{1}{2}+\epsilon_A^{(0)} </math> Alice forces Bob to declare <math>0</math> <math> P_{A}^{(1)}=1 </math> Alice forces Bob to declare <math>1</math> <math> P_{B}^{(0)}=1 </math> Bob forces Alice to declare <math>0</math> <math> P_{B}^{(1)}\leqslant\frac{1}{2}+ \epsilon_B^{(1)} </math> Bob forces Alice to declare <math>1</math> With quantum mechanics, on the other hand, WCF is crucial to the construction of optimal quantum SCF and quantum bit commitment schemes. Crucially and unlike quantum SCF, quantum WCF may reach biases arbitrarily close to zero: <math> \epsilon \rightarrow 0. </math> ==References== <div style='text-align: right;'>''contributed by Mathieu Bozzio''</div>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Quantum Protocol Zoo may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Quantum Protocol Zoo:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)